|
|
12-20-2010, 05:10 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 347
|
Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
Not sure if this is the right place to ask this question since it doesn't directly apply to SMBs, but...
This weekend I was talking to a guy who is a serious skier by winter, climber/hiker by summer. He (and wife and two kids) are toying with the idea of getting a recent year (2005-2008) 24' Born Free motorhome on an E450 chassis, and having an aftermarket 4x4 conversion done (he's seen pictures of one on the internet, but no contact information for the owner.)
Here's the question: when a van is converted from 2WD to 4x4, how is the fuel economy affected? And does it depend on how it's done (Quigley vs, say, the guys in Portland)?
Thanks.
__________________
GreyDawg
2017 T-250 MR 148" 3.7L cargo van. Slowly becoming a campervan...
|
|
|
12-20-2010, 08:01 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Long Beach, Ca
Posts: 985
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
To my understanding, since the front axle is turning with rear axle = more gears turning = more gas to make the rig move. Add the bigger tires + lift (more wind drag underneath)+ added weight of the 4x4 parts will decrease the MPG. That's my simple non mechanic profession theory........but of course, I can always be wrong.
__________________
???
"I do, cellularSTEVE" :o)
|
|
|
12-20-2010, 08:34 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 582
|
Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
Mine went from about 16-20 (empty cargo van) to about 14ish.
Which company likely matters little. Bigger factors are how much lift (think wind resistance), tire size (think rolling resistance), gearing (will determine RPM at a given speed), and total weight added.
__________________
Current: 2014 15 Passenger V8
Former: 2009 SMB 4x4 6.0
|
|
|
12-20-2010, 08:44 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 347
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
Thanks. I'll pass the information on. I had heard, somewhere long ago, that on an E350 the 4x4 conversion took a hit of about 2 mpg (gas). This seems to square with your replies.
__________________
GreyDawg
2017 T-250 MR 148" 3.7L cargo van. Slowly becoming a campervan...
|
|
|
12-20-2010, 08:50 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Spenard, Ak
Posts: 327
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
My 2001 Quigley (5.4) got 13mpg on the hwy but after I put the Super Duty axles and 37's under it it went up to 15 do to the re-gearing.
__________________
2001 RWB Quigley (not a SMB but love it)
Lots of Motorcycles (Dual Sports, Sportbikes and Sport Tourers)
|
|
|
12-20-2010, 10:20 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 5,300
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessenej
Which company likely matters little. Bigger factors are how much lift (think wind resistance), tire size (think rolling resistance), gearing (will determine RPM at a given speed), and total weight added.
|
x2. I'm pretty sure the added hardware alone makes for a negligible fuel penalty. But added height = added frontal area, and bigger tires = more drag. QuadVan has a 2" lift option (above 2wd) which also means stock tires, and I don't think there's much affect on the MPGs with that setup. Quigley only does a 4" setup.
Aftermarket bumpers also add wind drag.
For a motorhome, I think QuadVan is the only way to go, because Quigley installs a SRW axle up front, and uses SRW front wheel, even in Dually applications (this is a recent change.... was not always this way). Not only that, the front wheels are 17" even though the rear at 16". QuadVan installs a dually front axle, and sticks with the stock bolt pattern or converts the rear if you want the F-series bolt pattern. Either way QuadVan upgrades all wheels to 17" so they all match, and 2 spares are not needed.
__________________
2000 E450 dually V10 wagon
|
|
|
12-21-2010, 01:06 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 119
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
my 454ci quig gets 10-12 on 89 w/10%ethanol. it weighs 7000lbs so I think that's pretty good. on the way back from CO it got 13 with 87 (no ethanol) running 70+.
|
|
|
12-21-2010, 09:43 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Washington - Ridgefield
Posts: 4,728
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
We put 14,000 miles on our van (see signature) before converting it to 4wd. We took a 1mpg hit on the mileage. Would be alot more of a hit if we used 4wd very often. I suspect most of the loss of mileage is from the lift, a little from the increased weight. Weight went up about 600# on a 10,000# van that is only about 6% and likely a 1% or less loss of economy. But, the van is taller and the front bumper less aerodynamic.
Mike
__________________
Alaska to Key West, Labrador and more
Prostate cancer survivor. See Thread Prostate cancer and Sportsmobiles
2015 VW GTI 2020 Fiat 124 Spider
2012 E250 Hitop camper
|
|
|
12-21-2010, 07:50 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 347
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
All very interesting. Thanks, and I'll pass it on.
My question now is, why would someone who is "just" a ski bum need 4WD? Assuming he stays on paved roads, and carries chains (or has studded tires), is 4WD a must? or just a want?
I tend to think of 4WD for being off road -- snowy or otherwise.
__________________
GreyDawg
2017 T-250 MR 148" 3.7L cargo van. Slowly becoming a campervan...
|
|
|
12-22-2010, 09:47 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 637
|
Re: Basic 4x4 question: mileage?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyDawg
My question now is, why would someone who is "just" a ski bum need 4WD?
|
See this thread: Moving to somewhere snowy - should I get 4 x 4?.
Brent
__________________
2008 E350 EB, V10, GTRV Conversion
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|