Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteM
have you considered the Truma Combi heater/hot water unit instead of the old separate furnace and water heaters?
|
Hi Pete,
Thanks for your sensible advice. I think you're right that the Truma unit definitely has advantages. Like you say: "smaller, more efficient, smaller cutouts." Really strong pluses. My thinking for sticking with the old-style separate units is:
1) We don't plan on doing winter camping nor using the water heater that much and Sportsmobile said the Truma would cost thousands of dollars more. For something we wouldn't use much, it seemed a lot.
2) I'm probably an outlier here, but I like old technology that's been around a long time. They've made these old-style heaters for decades and I think there are a lot of repair companies around that know how to fix them. Also, I am thinking that parts for the old-style units may be more readily available and less expensive than the newer Truma units (imported from Germany IIRC). I'm not sure if there is anywhere near the same level of service familiarity or parts availability with the Truma units. The old-style units also seem relatively simple, hopefully reducing repair costs.
3) I like that the furnace and water heater are separate so that if one breaks, the other isn't affected.
Related to this, I saw a neat combination sink and cooktop in one unit. I liked that it seemed to take up less counter space and looked like it would be easier to clean. But I didn't like that if I had a problem with either the cooktop or the sink plumbing, it might affect the other (like if I had to remove the whole unit).
I'm certainly open to persuasion, but that is my thinking right now.
Thanks again. I think your suggestion is quite logical.
George