|
|
03-07-2017, 11:11 AM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 147
|
with numbers like that, it for sure it wont be a toy-hauler or anything like that
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 03:38 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 1,236
|
Personally I'd keep rocking the rig you have now and do some upgrades. But that's just me…
__________________
2004 E350 EB Quigley - aka MCSporty6.0
2013 Fiat 500 pop/abarth - Sold
2003 Land Rover Disco II
1997 E350 7.3l 2wd - Sold
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 04:00 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 147
|
Yep, that the current plan.. But Id like to keep my options open. Im lowering the current rig and putting softer springs on as soon as they come in, as well as these Sulastic dampeners Sulastic. Leaf Spring Shackle in hopes that it wont bounce everything of the shelves while driving on the highway.
Also, going to rebuild the interior (planning on making a rebuilding album here to keep track). New floor, better insulation, and hopfully a taller roof
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 07:22 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 5,300
|
Sulastic shackles are great, but they won't make the ride "plush". They remove harshness, and that's it. Probably won't help from launching stuff off the shelves but will greatly reduce the "bang" over bad expansion joints.
__________________
2000 E450 dually V10 wagon
|
|
|
03-08-2017, 06:39 AM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 147
|
Just that would be a great improvement. since the lift its downright dangerous at highway speeds over those joints, especially when the road is wet.
|
|
|
03-08-2017, 06:55 AM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 459
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beaker
The 2017 trailer towing guide lists the 2.8L van as capable of towing anywhere from 5800# to 6800#, depending on window configuration and wheelbase. The big catch is that the GCVWR is 13,000#. This is a pretty dramatic drop from the 19,000# GCVWR of last year's 6.6L or the 20,000# of the most capable E350s, when they were still available.
Realistically, you are looking at a maximum trailer towing capacity of 3500#, if your 2.8L van is set up with a typical camper conversion.
|
Hello.
Generally, here in Australia, the motor size as a rule of thumb, equates to the towing capacity. Eg. 3.5 litre = 3.5 tons. 2.8 litre = 2.8 tons. Part of the rule is the weight of the tow vehicle. Then there is power to weight ratio.
You can't beat a big V8 diesel = Torque/Power/Economy. Not revving it's guts out. Not burnt out after 120,000 miles, like a compact 3/3.5 litre Mercedes diesel.
Only time will tell.
Cheer Doug
__________________
2008 Yellow Ford E350 6.0 diesel eb50 4x4, Front E Locker, Asheville Eng Rebuil 20th @ 261miles, ARP Studds, 200amp Alternator, Performance Aluminium Radiator, OnBoardAir, RoadmasterActiveSuspension, Front & Rear Aluminess with Spare Tire Carrier, Aluminess Roof Rack, Titan Aft 30gallon Fuel Tank.
|
|
|
03-08-2017, 08:27 AM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriffdoug
Hello.
Generally, here in Australia, the motor size as a rule of thumb, equates to the towing capacity. Eg. 3.5 litre = 3.5 tons. 2.8 litre = 2.8 tons. Part of the rule is the weight of the tow vehicle. Then there is power to weight ratio.
You can't beat a big V8 diesel = Torque/Power/Economy. Not revving it's guts out. Not burnt out after 120,000 miles, like a compact 3/3.5 litre Mercedes diesel.
Only time will tell.
Cheer Doug
|
thanks doug,
I havent ever thought of it that way. Damn metric system... when will the rest of the world come to the dark side of the US Imperial system... its Imperial after all. </sarcasm>
My research for this van (the 2.8) is that im not running a fully loaded sportsmobile. Ill have a 11lb tank of propane, 7 gal of water, funiture, food, some tech for a mobile office, and some fairly basic solar setup -with frame rail battery. So, im not adding too much weight to the van in reality. But, as a born Redneck, I do love my big block V8s
|
|
|
03-29-2017, 07:59 AM
|
#28
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 147
|
Got to test drive the new 2.8 rb, and I have to say I'm impressed. It's not a drag racer of the line, but really smooth takeoff and when the turbo hits, you can really tell. And the ride is about 100 times better than my econoline.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
03-29-2017, 11:34 AM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 121
|
My 98 Express 3500 with the 5.7 only has 250hp and 330lb-ft, so this 2.8 litre is pretty darn close in output to what I'm currently driving. I don't haul anything very heavy (dune buggy, motorcycle, bicycles) and the van currently weighs just a tad over 8000lbs when loaded up for a trip. It's got a full sportsmobile build-out with the pop-top. I have zero issues with my van's current power. Would it be nice to have some more? Of course, but I don't need it and it really makes me wonder how much better the fuel economy of this new diesel will compare to my measly 10mpg (around town) and 13mpg highway.
capn
|
|
|
03-29-2017, 04:33 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 147
|
Thanks capn, that's good news for us that travel light and not a full smb.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|