Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-19-2018, 10:06 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Riverside Ca.
Posts: 738
So the engine is the same therefore subject to the same potencial failure just at a lower level of probabillity and occurence but still subject to less reliabillity or am I incorrect in my statement? I use to play tournament softball. Our sponser was a Ford dealer, my friend worked as the parts mngr. I visit him quite frequently over the years. Every time I did there was a F350 cab on the lift getting an engine swap. I would testify to this along with conversations about the motor. He told me many times he was glad I had bought the last of te 7.3's I really feel that Ford should have been ordered to have a recall on these motors, I think the low testing time and over engineeing trying to meet emissions ect... was an issue on these 6.0.

Vanimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2018, 10:59 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
BVerhulst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanimal View Post
So the engine is the same therefore subject to the same potencial failure just at a lower level of probabillity and occurence but still subject to less reliabillity or am I incorrect in my statement? I use to play tournament softball. Our sponser was a Ford dealer, my friend worked as the parts mngr. I visit him quite frequently over the years. Every time I did there was a F350 cab on the lift getting an engine swap. I would testify to this along with conversations about the motor. He told me many times he was glad I had bought the last of te 7.3's I really feel that Ford should have been ordered to have a recall on these motors, I think the low testing time and over engineeing trying to meet emissions ect... was an issue on these 6.0.
The root of Ford's problems with the 6.0 PSD is that it was designed and tested to produce 235 hp, which turns out was well behind the competition (Duramax and Cummins), even back in 2003. So Ford tuned it in the F-series; problems ensued. What's worse is when owners tuned the GM and Dodge trucks, they really really outperformed the PSD. Tuning a PSD to keep up with the Joneses is a sure way to induce engine failure - head gaskets, EGR, turbo, the list goes on and on.
__________________
Brian
2009 E-350 Lopes 55
BVerhulst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2018, 09:56 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Riverside Ca.
Posts: 738
I have never driven a 6.0 so I can not comment but I have a 7.3 and without the intercooler I keep a close watch on the EGT's! I have a Frieghtliner business class FL70 intercooler I will install at some point (17 or more years later)! My fear on the 6.0 is the potential failure in a remote area even D-tuned!
Vanimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Sportsmobile SIP or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.