|
|
02-08-2013, 09:29 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 5,300
|
Dodge Promaster
Well, all yalls have another van choice now. 2014 Dodge Pornmaster.
Front wheel drive, gas engine shared with the Caravan, tows 5,000 pounds and uh... its a van. Maybe Dodge will just include the candy with each purchase. Not sure how else they're sell them. Are side windows are even an option?
Nissan NV all of a sudden is a decent looking van.
http://blog.chryslercommercialvehicl...ram-promaster/
__________________
2000 E450 dually V10 wagon
|
|
|
02-08-2013, 09:34 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 5,300
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
PS - I'm pretty sure this is what happens when you lock automotive designers in seperate windowless rooms, and tell them all to make their assigned component without talking with eachother, then thowing it all together at the end.
The door lines don't match. The front and rear wheel wells aren't even the same profile. WTF happened to the headlights?!? Front bumper looks like they unrolled a traffic barrel, cut some holes it it with a sawzall, then covered it in plastidip.
__________________
2000 E450 dually V10 wagon
|
|
|
02-08-2013, 10:31 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pocatello, ID
Posts: 290
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
I agree, not pretty, but I still like it better than the Nissan!
Mike and Kris
__________________
2006 Ford E350 6.0 PSD, RB 50, 4x4
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 12:41 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 33
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
Dodge Pornmaster?
__________________
Javier Saavedra
SMB Dodge 3500 97 RB 2WD PH
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 06:51 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 10,241
|
Dodge Promaster
Ewww.
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 07:21 AM
|
#6
|
Site Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern New Mexico
Posts: 10,179
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
They all look the same to me. Reminds me of sedans from 10 years ago, when you couldn't tell a Honda, from a Nissan, from a Toyota.
__________________
SMB-less as of 02/04/2012. Our savings account is richer, but our adventures are poorer.
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 02:13 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Switzerland soon back to Oregon
Posts: 733
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
This might be the window version, the dodge base is the european Fiat ducato
You could do this with it:
__________________
2009 E350 window RB 6.0 PSD Quadvan 4x4 with EB pop top
2003 E350 ambulance 7.3 PSD Quigley
2007 Jeep JK for local offroad
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 08:53 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: santa rosa ca
Posts: 994
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
Quote:
Originally Posted by carringb
2014 Dodge Pornmaster.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsaavedrav
Dodge Pornmaster?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86Scotty
Ewww.
|
Yeah I was trying to figure out if that was just fat fingers or intentional.
__________________
... Charlie
EV-2 build is now complete, (yeah right).
KZ6T
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 09:11 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 1,228
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
Not a very good looking specimen. The Transit looks better IMO.
__________________
Desert Solitaire
2003 7.3L EB 4x4
Timberline 4x4 conversion
|
|
|
03-21-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 577
|
Re: Dodge Promaster
Would agree the new Ford Transit looks newer and less boxy than the Ram ProMaster/Fiat Ducato, but there are reasons why the Ducato is so popular in Europe for class Bs. For those of us not looking to go off-road or tow large trailers the ProMaster’s front wheel drive and associated packaging efficiency seems to offer some advantages over the Transit. Provided we can get over the aesthetics of course.
Functionally the Ram’s lower step-in height, lower center of gravity, added 4-inches of headroom when both vans are 101 inches tall (Ford medium roof versus Ram high roof), greater interior cargo volume and smaller overall outside dimensions will go a long way towards offsetting the odd appearance. Besides, when comparing the largest models the Ram’s longer wheelbase and shorter rear overhang look more balanced. The Ford Jumbo’s rear overhang just looks excessively long in my opinion.
To me vans don’t look great anyway so function trumps aesthetics. The largest Ram to be offered in the US will have about 530 cubic feet of volume versus the Ford Transit Jumbo at 496 cubic feet. And the Ram, at 250 inches in length (just under 21 feet) is 16-inches shorter than the Extended Length Transit at 266 inches (just over 22 feet). And while it’s true the Ford Jumbo offers greater headroom than the tallest US ProMaster, 6’-4” of interior headroom (unfinished) is plenty for me. Anything beyond that just makes these tall vans appear even more top heavy. A good example is the European Fiat Ducato with an even taller roof.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|