Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-03-2015, 09:09 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 275
Re: Landuse Discussion

How'd the Ranger get out there? On foot?

GUILTY AS CHARGED!

200 years ago,
today,
tomorrow.

No need to widen the road each time you drive out.
But spill a drop of paint in the gutter, in the big city, which is basically paint, and get a fine?


Elltom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2015, 11:02 PM   #12
REF
Senior Member
 
REF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Boulder, CO.
Posts: 2,554
Send a message via MSN to REF
Re: Landuse Discussion

I'm glad this was moved from the trip report, and I guess I'll chime in here to maybe ease some of the angst, as it's sort of turned into something else completely. Politics aside, I felt that in this case the ranger was just doing his job, while we all felt we were abiding by state park rules and camping within the boundaries set, and although we never parked beyond the wash, I think it's fair to say that we all understood our dogs were to be leashed, which they were not, and none of us were ticketed in the end. Another point to make is that the forecast called for rain, and I for one, moved to higher ground out of a low spot along the road after discussing it the night before with Chris, I felt that was probably a good call, if we had had a good rain, I can just imagine the consequences of being in the middle of the wash where the ranger had us move to. The other point to make is that I'm sure that these Rangers deal with all kinds of people in those parts, and just like cops, are trained to approach every situation with caution and with the worst case scenario in mind. Imagine pulling up solo to a scene like that out in the middle of nowhere with a dozen beefed up vans, 2 dozen people and a bunch of dogs running around, it's got to be intimidating, he came in aggressive, announced his presence over his PA and got our attention while he assessed the scene, he mellowed as soon as he realized we weren't a threat or aggressive defensive jagoffs.
__________________
'03 Ford E350 7.3L Diesel
(de)SMB'd Custom RB-50
Quigley 4X4 w/Deavers & Agile Offroad's R.I.P. package
CCV High Profile Pop Top
REF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2015, 01:18 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Christopher Thwaites's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa CA
Posts: 638
Re: Landuse Discussion

Ok.....this will be a stream of consciousness comment....... we won't likely have a consensus if we poll everyone who was actually there. 28+ people will have at least 14 opinions. Rick states it perfectly in MY opinion (2 of 14). I think the ongoing rant is healthy and it gives us all an opportunity to vent. I didn't like having to move my van to the other side of the bush to satisfy the ranger's interpretation of the rules but I did it because I didn't want to argue a technicality. Everyone wanted to challenge the Ranger but none of us had actually read the rules as outlined in the brochure he gave us. The brochure says on page 6 " vehicles must be parked no more than 1 vehicle length off the road. Do not trample vegetation or drive over geological features." Some vans WERE more than a vehicle length off the road. No vegetation was driven over or harmed and no geological feature was driven over(well except by my and Gooseberry's RC rock crawlers). I actually encouraged Gooseberry and another van to move off of the road in anticipation of bad weather....which we got....but no flooding. I think we dodged a bullet with regard to the dogs. Having lost my dog last August this was my first trip in 14 years without her. Being a former offender I was surprised at how annoyed I got with almost everyone's dog being off leash. I felt like I was in a dog park most of the time. I buried 5 or 6 piles of poop. BillPa almost lost a perfectly good steak to one of the dogs. Any food at dog level was fair game. Not cool. Not the dog's fault. Had we been confrontational with the ranger my guess is he would have issued tickets for off leash dogs. AND made us move some of the vans. I think none of us move about the world we live in with the intention of breaking laws so it does raise our hackles a bit when it is suggested we are doing just that. I'll be interested in Gooseberry's full study of the vehicle code as it pertains to vehicles parked off of a state highway. All of the roads in Anza Borrego State Park are considered state highways to ensure that only properly licensed vehicles use them. I think we all did our best to abide by the rules. Did we all pack out our toilet paper and human waste??? (see page 6) Think about your off leash dog next time you camp. Walk a mile in the rangers shoes. They used to be docents of the parks. A changing Society, not politicians, made it necessary for them to become cops. Sad. Teach your children just like Lake is being taught to love and respect his world. Owning a Sportsmobile does not make you special.
Chris
__________________
Chris/Ruth
2016 MBZ Sprinter 144" 4wd.
DIY
07 BMW 525xi wagon
Christopher Thwaites is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2015, 01:09 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 527
Re: Landuse Discussion

I arrived at the Olla Wash camp site Thursday night after most people had left so I am not a first hand witness but do have a few comments. After everyone left Saturday morning; Bill, J&M and the FJ couple, I had a cordial wave and hello with the ranger. I'm quite certain this was the same ranger that 6 weeks ago spent an hour with a group I was with at Blair Valley campground trying to catch and control a loose dog. In the process he was nipped by the animal. He wrote the owner a ticket ($$$'s) for an aggressive dog and banished her from the park for the weekend. As any law enforcement person they do not know what they are getting into when approaching a large group. It would seem prudent to make the approach as described. Also, On the other side of the road where I parked we picked up at least one dog dump, the second one may have been a local critter. If you bring a dog to ABDSP, respect the rules and your fellow campers. There are many other choices if you prefer off leash activities.
__________________
2004 SMB 4x4 RB 6.0 PSD; ARP Head Studs, Gen 3 Cylinder Heads, BPD Oil Cooler connected to AMSOil Bypass, a whistling Wicked Wheel Turbo, Coolant Filter, Upgraded alternator, ScanGauge, SCT custom and SMB Fox shocks.
BFG 285/75 R16 KM3 Mud Terrains on ProComp 7069's
PatO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2015, 01:54 PM   #15
Site Team
 
daveb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Turlock Ca
Posts: 10,409
Garage
Re: Landuse Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Thwaites
<cut> I didn't like having to move my van to the other side of the bush to satisfy the ranger's interpretation of the rules but I did it because I didn't want to argue a technicality. Everyone wanted to challenge the Ranger but none of us had actually read the rules as outlined in the brochure he gave us. The brochure says on page 6 " vehicles must be parked no more than 1 vehicle length off the road. Do not trample vegetation or drive over geological features." Some vans WERE more than a vehicle length off the road. No vegetation was driven over or harmed and no geological feature was driven over <cut> I was surprised at how annoyed I got with almost everyone's dog being off leash. I felt like I was in a dog park most of the time. I think we all did our best to abide by the rules. Did we all pack out our toilet paper and human waste??? (see page 6) Think about your off leash dog next time you camp. Walk a mile in the rangers shoes. They used to be docents of the parks. A changing Society, not politicians, made it necessary for them to become cops. <cut>
Chris
Well Chris I wasn't there and can't comment on your situation down in AB but it does seem like we are all being pushed into a smaller box year after year. When I see where some idiot decides to take their vehicle into a fragile area to spin a brody it pisses me off to see the destruction but it also upsets me because the government agency in charge is probably going to over react and close off the area to everybody. But being restricted in a wash that changes after a storm would seem excessive IMO. I do agree that the rangers are there to enforce the laws set up by government agencies so I don't normally blame them but I have had issues with the overzealous types. I can see where the dog situation could have upset the ranger and can't blame him on that. Really it's the camping location restrictions that are being setup that I have issues with.

I've never been to Anza but if they force you to camp one vehicle length off the trail I doubt I'll ever go there unless they let you camp off spur trails that aren't subjected to the heavier traffic.

[edit] BTW, that spot that you and Ruth camped at on Sonora pass with me is now closed off. They added boulders and now you can't drive to where we camped... what good did that do? It's a paved path for cryin out loud
__________________
2006 Ford 6.0PSD EB-50/E-PH SMB 4X4 Rock Crawler Trailer

Sportsmobile 4X4 Adventures..........On and off road adventures
daveb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2015, 09:43 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 242
Garage
Re: Landuse Discussion

I worked for the National Park Service for 20 years and spent my career working in the backcountry of the western US, particularly in the Rocky Mountain state. I was also marred to a law enforcement ranger for a bunch of years. I can guarantee that there are plenty of idiot, overzealous rangers in all land management agencies that give the rest of the reasonable hardworking ones a bad name. Having waited up at night for my wife to come home from the night shift in the backcountry or simply patrolling established campgrounds, I know firsthand there is no "routine" traffic stop or shift. So I tend to give them all the benefit of the doubt and treat them all with respect, even if they don't always deserve it. Even the aholes might be the one bailing you out of a jam tomorrow.

I agree with Dave that we are getting pushed into a smaller box every year, and sadly that pertains to a lot of what we do on public lands (whether that's state or federal or whatever); I experience that as a hunter, camper, driver, kiter, rockclimber, etc. Even as a professional paleontologist, I have to compete with a slew of other competing interests to get my job done.

That's life in the 21st Century. Bottom line is there are already so many of us living here and more and more every day. This is NOT the same planet or country as it was when I was a kid. I hate sharing "my" backcountry. But I have to now, or go someplace else. I hate it when I go to the place I used to hunt or camp or climb and find locked gages and private property signs, too. But everyone (who can afford it) wants to own their own little piece of heaven and to keep ME out. The nerve!

But on pubic lands we've just got to keep doing our own personal best to keep protecting what's left out there and supporting those whose job it is to do the same. I can also say that most of them get paid crap for what they do and have miniscule budgets to work with. I can't speak for California state lands, but here in Utah the amount of money they get in fines doesn't amount to jack. User fees are a different story.
Makalu1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2015, 10:23 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Pschitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,018
Garage
Re: Landuse Discussion

I dont want to hijack this thread but just want to give another perception of a European guy.

Compared to Europe, US is a real land of freedom. They are so many public lands, National Parks, State Parks, County Parks, BLM lands... For comparison, in Europe, there is almost no more places you can boondock, all RV are parked in kind of parking lot especially for RV, mostly without restroom or showers... That's really the positive side here, you can boondock in any National Forest, they are primitive campground in so many places on public lands...

The bad side : I was really chocked that everywhere you go, you find garbage and litter, even sometimes in the middle of nowhere after several hours hiking. Not only garbage but also ATV and dirt bike tracks that often last several years before the nature erase those. Almost every day I travel, I see cans or other garbage recently thrown down the same day, people continue just to throw away, despite the signs warning for high fines. You won't never see that in Europe... So I can understand why the box is getting smaller year after year, even if people told me that it's already much better than 20 years ago.

Anyway, I'm convinced that SMB or related vehicle owners are not the most concerned by destroying landscape they travel through. It's definitely more ATV, OVH, dirt bikes or Jeeps who let their tracks everywhere off the trails... But don't forget: it's still much more free here than in every European country...
__________________
Travelling in VivaLaVida (custom 2010 6.0 Ford E-350 Extended with U-Joint 4WD conversion)
Pschitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 09:57 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
geoffff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,061
Re: Landuse Discussion

If you want to step back in time, try Baja California. There are still fewer fences, fewer signs, fewer enforced rules -- and more freedom. And more trash.

But this is changing, with private property restrictions appearing all over the southern cape from Cabo to La Paz. And I don't even bother with anything north of Ensenada.

-- Geoff
__________________
2004 Ford, SMB 4x4, RB-50
https://octopup.org/sportsmobile
geoffff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 11:26 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
rallypanam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Francisco/Nevada City
Posts: 3,769
Re: Landuse Discussion

I think the general confusion in this case is that most of us are familiar with National Forest rules and we were camping according to them, but the Anza Borrego rules were contradictory in many aspects.

Guess we should have done more research.
rallypanam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 08:51 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
DisabledExplorers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 233
Re: Landuse Discussion

All the info stated here is why I do everything I can to avoid any recreation in Kalifornia.
Living in Arizona we have plenty of idiots and are getting more and more rules but at least it isn't as bad as Kali.

Speaking of Baja I was there in October and going back in a couple of weeks and often prefer it to the USA.
More open areas to camp, fewer idiots and great food.
__________________
Go out and play in the dirt!
DisabledExplorers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Sportsmobile Registry

Betsy

Dave&Di

GIL

Manoel Brazil
Add your Sportsmobile
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Sportsmobile SIP or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.