Why not to post large attachments

[daveb]

Originally Posted by charlie56

Wow
Was able to read the gettysburg address and all
the other posts before your photo loaded on my iPhone.
It really messed up my ability to type this reply
The top of the photo looks nice though. Maybe in an
hour or so I will see the complete photo. Waiting for the
iPhone 5 next month with 4G. This old iPhone is too slow.

I just illustrated the absurd with absurdity

[Ford_6L_E350]

Maybe you need to add a link to this thread in the FAQ's under attachment size?

Mike

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by daveb

I just illustrated the absurd with absurdity

Ya sure did, Dave. That image starts on my screen and goes right out the door!

[jage]

Makes replying a PITA too, however part of the reason for allowing attachments is for the less web savvy
folks who can't manage the gallery. Attaching is more like an email, and so less restrictive in order not to
put roadblocks down, but still limiting the problems to a smaller set of the whole. That's the theory anyway.