|
03-17-2008, 12:38 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 91
|
Dodge or Ford?
I am in the market for an SMB, hence all of my questions. I would preferred to buy a used SMB if I can find one mostly equipped the way I like it, no small achievement. It seems like there are more Fords than Dodges, and what Dodges there are sell for less. Any reason to prefer Fords to Dodges? Thanks.
|
|
|
03-17-2008, 01:33 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 236
|
personally I think Ford makes better vans than Dodge or Chevy, but then again I have owned a few Fords and have a preference to them. Is there a scientific reason?
__________________
2000 Ford RB30 PH 2WD -- Eagle Rock California
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 12:00 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Whenever Possible
Posts: 1,012
|
I've owned all three brands in different configurations. If buying new, then I'd go with Chevy because of the Duramax and a better history when it comes to transmissions. Ford would be second on my list. I have developed a complete hatred of Mopar products. I've had bad luck with anything Mopar (Dodge, Chrylser, Jeep). If comparing motors (diesel) only, the somewhat accepted breakdown for many from best to worse is Chev, Dodge, Ford. Opinions will vary, I'm sure. I own a Ford SMB and a big Chev pickup (that I still need to sell). To answer your specific question regarding used SMB Ford vs. Dodge, then Ford all the way. I believe you want to avoid '99 older 7.3s due to small turbo and some other issues I can't remember right now. Also, I've heard of issues regarding the first 6.0 motors. The V-10 is bombproof and came with a better trans for a number of years (until both the diesel and the V-10 came with the better trans (at least that's the info I got from....Quadvan?). Want to say '04-on for the better diesel trans, but can't remember for sure. Someone here knows for sure, I'd wager. I have a '03 and the trans crapped out at 82k.
__________________
It takes a village to raise an idiot.
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 02:52 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 91
|
Thanks for the feedback deminimis. My instincts on Dodges (and Chryslers generally) are similar to your take. There is, however, a 2002 Dodge RB 50 with a 5.2L V8, around 51,000 miles. If Dodge vans are a bit more maintenance heavy, I might be willing to live with it as I likely won't be putting that many miles on it per year. If they are a major headache on the other hand, I would just as soon pass......
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 03:14 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Whenever Possible
Posts: 1,012
|
Most of my buddies have Dodges (pickups (most of them also have Harleys, so that tells you something)). $300-$500 fuel pump problems (yup, I had that failure too) and trans failures most all under 100k (yup, that cost us some money as well). Ours was gas. Then there were the little things. Just seemed like a whole lot of little sensor hassles about once a year and other PITA issues. Finally got rid of our last Mopar product back in the Fall. Once warmed up, it would crank and crank and crank before it would start. Replaced the nightmare Crank Position Sensor as that was the only code that would show. Still didn't fix it. I freak'n hate Mopar! Those bastards owe me a skin graph for all the times I scraped my knuckles working on one. Sorry, just had a little flashback there. Not trying to get into a debate folks, its just my opinion.
__________________
It takes a village to raise an idiot.
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 08:13 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 308
|
My experience with all makes is they all have problems.
The newer the vehicle the fewer problems.
Dodge transmissions are finicky about trans fluid.
Dodge steering couplers are garbage
A quick check on www.allpar.com finds common issues. Trans problems are an issue with Chrysler, but several service shops will replace the trans rather than change fluid or adjust bands. like here--> http://www.allpar.com/fix/trans.html
---------
That being said, GM right now has the most improved van and great engines with more power and similar fuel economy. Especially better for SMB's is the EB which features a longer wheelbase than the Ford or old dodge...better for towing and ride, much better for our top heavy SMB's.
|
|
|
03-19-2008, 07:35 AM
|
#7
|
Site Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern New Mexico
Posts: 10,179
|
Persoanlly, I'd take a Cummins diesel over anything from Ford or Chevy. Reliable and easy to get additional power out of.
Dodge's newest diesel engine (still an inline 6) gets 350hp at 3000 rpm, and 650 ft-lbs at 1500 rpm. Downside is, you can't get it in a van and Dodge hasn't even made passenger vans (unless you consider a Sprinter) for years.
For the combination of van chassis, body, engine and transmission, the Ford was the best choice for me.
Herb
__________________
SMB-less as of 02/04/2012. Our savings account is richer, but our adventures are poorer.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|