Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-07-2007, 07:48 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Greg In Austin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,543
Send a message via AIM to Greg In Austin Send a message via Yahoo to Greg In Austin
WHEELS and TIRES

OK, here is the update....

We are about decided on a wheel and tire combo.
...and the van has not yet been delivered to Fresno

We are going with :

American Eagle 186s 18x9 (possibly powder coated)
load cap 3450lbs
and
Cooper Discoverer STT LT 325/65/R18
35 inch w/ load cap of 3860lbs

So tell us why this is a good idea?

or

Tell us why this is a bad idea AND what would be better?

Thanks,

Greg in Austin
2008 Ford EB SMB4x4 PSD ... ON ORDER!

__________________
Greg in Austin
2008 Ford 6.0PSD EB/E-PH SMB 4X4 Aluminess f/r bumpers (13.5mpg avg, 15mpg hwy) 52k miles [Texas McBeast]
2006 Toyota Prius (48 to 68 mpg) 120k miles [Penelope]
2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon (15 to 18 mpg) [Johnnie]
2012 Mitsubishi MiEV (no gas required) ($.50/day in electricity) [Evie]
https://badge.facebook.com/badge/1232...3.32047100.png
Greg In Austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 12:44 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nevada
Posts: 181
Tires and wheels

18x9 .... Not so good for off-road especially with 35inch tires. Too much

wheel not enough tire... They would handle well on road.. It's hard to have it

all ! 8 inch wheels are easier on the wheel bearings, plus the bulge in the

side wall protects the rim better. I have a set of Toyo M/Ts 18 sitting in my

garage, can't figure out what to use them on.


JM
__________________
2006 Sportsmobile PSD-----69 Jeepster----BMW1200GS---450 KTM----450YFZ--- 2007 F150----2005 Nissan
myriadmyriad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:33 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Greg In Austin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,543
Send a message via AIM to Greg In Austin Send a message via Yahoo to Greg In Austin
JM,

You missed the important part of the question....

"AND what would be better?"

I am hearing that these tires and wheels are very good offroad.
The combo also has a much greater load capacity, which should help combat what seems to be the biggest tire problem that SMBs have.
Since we are getting an EB van, we feel the 35 inch tire also just looks better due to the scale of the big white van.

Thank you for playing, Please try again.
__________________
Greg in Austin
2008 Ford 6.0PSD EB/E-PH SMB 4X4 Aluminess f/r bumpers (13.5mpg avg, 15mpg hwy) 52k miles [Texas McBeast]
2006 Toyota Prius (48 to 68 mpg) 120k miles [Penelope]
2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon (15 to 18 mpg) [Johnnie]
2012 Mitsubishi MiEV (no gas required) ($.50/day in electricity) [Evie]
https://badge.facebook.com/badge/1232...3.32047100.png
Greg In Austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 10:18 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
jage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 7,644
But 9" wide rims has less to do with 35s than the 325/ which is 12.75" in width. I used to have problems on 8" rims with 10.5" tires because they folded back from the bead even at anything lower than 20 lbs.

Going to 7" wide would have solved my problem- problem being that the bead would get jammed with little sticks and junk and cause slow leaks @12psi. This was pretty serious wheeling and I never lost a bead because of it, just wound up with annoying slow leaks and having to clean out my beads.

Of course for overkill's sake, I bought 8" beadlock rims instead of going to 7". Going with a wider tire would have solved the problem too.

Gist is, I think 8" wide rim and 12.75" wide tire is fine for most anything that isn't going to tear the van to pieces anyway.
__________________
it was good to be back
jage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 10:20 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
jage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 7,644
Oh and I think JM was suggesting going to x8" rims instead of x9..
__________________
it was good to be back
jage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 12:26 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nevada
Posts: 181
Wheels and tires

Greg See my post dated 10-30

JM
__________________
2006 Sportsmobile PSD-----69 Jeepster----BMW1200GS---450 KTM----450YFZ--- 2007 F150----2005 Nissan
myriadmyriad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 06:04 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Greg In Austin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,543
Send a message via AIM to Greg In Austin Send a message via Yahoo to Greg In Austin
Re: Wheels

Quote:
Originally Posted by myriadmyriad
17x8 is perfect..... with 295/70/17 tires.. Big tires are tough on the suspension components. Aluminum wheels save a ton of weight,but they should be rated for 3000lbs load... You have to shop around for that rating. I like American racing or MT classics(Made by Alcoa)...

JM
"AND what would be better?"

I have run oversized tires on my current 4wd for close to 300k miles and have not had any suspension component issues.

Both the tires and wheels we have selected are rated far above the 3000lb load carrying you described, in fact even the standard equipment is rated above 3000.

We are going with :

American Eagle 186s 18x9 (possibly powder coated)
load cap 3450lbs
and
Cooper Discoverer STT LT 325/65/R18
35 inch w/ load cap of 3860lbs

We have heard about all the tire problems folks have had, and we want to avoid that. We do not want to be running at Max Load or Max pressure all the time.

I am more concerned about travtion in soft material than I am about rock-crawling. I don't think we will be doing a lot of rock crawling on purpose, but soft stuff is another story...

so by increasing the tire size to 35in and moving to 18 wheels we are getting a combined load carrying of 15440 lbs out of the tires.

So tell us why this selection is a good idea?

or

Tell us WHY this is a bad idea AND what would be better?

Thanks,
__________________
Greg in Austin
2008 Ford 6.0PSD EB/E-PH SMB 4X4 Aluminess f/r bumpers (13.5mpg avg, 15mpg hwy) 52k miles [Texas McBeast]
2006 Toyota Prius (48 to 68 mpg) 120k miles [Penelope]
2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon (15 to 18 mpg) [Johnnie]
2012 Mitsubishi MiEV (no gas required) ($.50/day in electricity) [Evie]
https://badge.facebook.com/badge/1232...3.32047100.png
Greg In Austin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 06:44 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
jage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 7,644
For the soft stuff you want to float as much as possible- my experience being with soft fine sand like in Silverlake MI.

What I understand helps in sand:
Tire width: wider is better
Airing Down 1: wider compared to your rims prob means you can air down more
Weight: Not much you can do about this
Tread: ATs are way better than MTs as the latter digs you in.
Airing Down 2: I believe you'll get more footprint with more sidewall, eg. 17" rims but the trade off in load range from what I've seen doesn't seem to be somewhere you want to go.

Load range and capacity are in all your posts, so I'm assuming that's your #1 thing. The only way to get better performance in sand without detracting from your #1 is to go a little bit wider, which will help you air down further and have a bigger footprint. Is it worth going wider from the size you're at? I doubt it.

I think you've got a pretty solid tire and rim selection going and there isn't much anyone can say to refute it. Your air pressure is going to play a bigger role than your tire selection- I've seen guys running in the 20s in jeeps digging themselves in and having the worst day. Getting them to air down to 12psi and suddenly their rig is floating around having a grand time. Finding the right pressure for your rig and tire/wheel combo is going to be more important, but other than getting a set of sand paddles or going ridiculously wide I don't think you're going to get majorly better performance.

Oh and on my F250 I had BFG ATs and got them replaced with BFG AT/KOs the same size.. I don't know for sure with numbers, but I think I went from E to D or something because all of the sudden the side wall bulged way more at the same pressure, and although they've been fine I don't like the way they feel (sloppy). I should probably look into it, but I'm not a numbers guy and won't bother until I need new tires.

I hope you get these, I think they'll be right and I think you'll be able to come back to the forum and tell us how great a combination these are for an EB instead of worrying about all this conjecture and opinion.
__________________
it was good to be back
jage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 07:03 PM   #19
Site Team
 
BroncoHauler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern New Mexico
Posts: 10,179
If you plan on airing down, have a GOOD compressor handy. Big tires = long air up times.


Herb
__________________
SMB-less as of 02/04/2012. Our savings account is richer, but our adventures are poorer.
BroncoHauler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Sportsmobile SIP or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.