Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-09-2015, 09:50 AM   #91
Senior Member
 
scatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Blairsden, CA (when not on the road)
Posts: 1,109
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

I've run BFG KO's (load range D) on at least a half dozen rigs for over 300,000 miles and the only problems I've had are a few flats from household items. Key, screwdriver, pliers, etc.
Will be getting a full set of the new KO2's this fall after I get a few more miles on the KO's still on the van.
I know some folks seem to have problems, but I'm sticking with a proven winner for me.
I've also done a lot of work with tire manufactures on reduced tire pressure and heat and the bottom line is if you can hold your hand on the sidewall the temps are OK. If it's too hot to keep your hand there it's time to air up or slow down a bit.

Good luck everyone on your tire selections. At least there're a lot of choices out there now. Not like a few years back.

__________________
Scatter
You can be anything you want on the Internet,
it amazes me that so many choose stupid....

2007 RB50, 6.0
K1WGB
scatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 10:32 AM   #92
Senior Member
 
Jeffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,841
Garage
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

My story is the same as Scatter's. But I just put on a set of 315-75 R16 KO2's and they are fine so far....still new.
__________________
'07 RB-50 - My Photo Site -- K1JGS --
Jeffrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 12:22 PM   #93
Senior Member
 
MadScience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 809
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

It's clear that the BFGs are working fine for a lot of folks, otherwise we'd be seeing a recall.

I did in fact consider a like replacement, but after reading about tread separation in general, I specifically wondered about the combination of beating on them on trails and then running them on the freeway. This led me to look for a tire that was explicitly supposed to be sturdy. I ended up with one of the Goodyears, even though I know that they have had some serious issues with other lines.

Michelins seem like a good choice, but aren't available in an aggressive tread in my size. Nothing Toyo makes is available in even remotely my size, so I didn't even investigate them.

Since this can happen with just about any tire given some undetected damage, my take-away from this is:

1) A stop for tire inspection should include checking the tread area. (in theory I knew this, but I
didn't check it at the time)

2) If a tire does go, don't lift, in fact get into the throttle, catch the starting drift and then slow down
and pull over. (I did well enough at this, but did use a foot of the thankfully empty lane next to me).

Finally I'm going to do more research on whether I should be running lower pressures, particularly for short stretches on trails. My tires were close to max, largely because that's correct for towing, and comfortable enough for other driving. I did measure tread depth across the failed tire and it was even, I'm not sure that that's a useful indicator for anything but alignment though.
__________________

'99 EB ex ENG KSWB news van, low rent 4x4 conversion (mostly fixed by now), home built interior.
MadScience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 12:33 PM   #94
Senior Member
 
rallypanam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Francisco/Nevada City
Posts: 3,769
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadScience
Nothing Toyo makes is available in even remotely my size, so I didn't even investigate them.
Toyo seemingly makes several options that are your size.
rallypanam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 01:20 PM   #95
Senior Member
 
coyotearms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 188
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scatter
I've run BFG KO's (load range D) on at least a half dozen rigs for over 300,000 miles and the only problems I've had are a few flats from household items. Key, screwdriver, pliers, etc.
Will be getting a full set of the new KO2's this fall after I get a few more miles on the KO's still on the van.
Your signature indicates you have a 2007 with SMB interior. Doesn't you door Ford Tire Label state you should be using E rated tires? If so, you are taking the chance of being at fault in an accident no matter who you think was the problem. Are you sure you are not exceeding the load rating of the tires you use? Some folks still do not know the importance of the E rating for their SMB rigs, which has be covered many times on this forum in other threads. Over and out---this thread has gotten scary!
__________________
2008 E-350 6.0L diesel: Bought new in 2010, 4x2, 4.10 LSD, HD spring-lift all 'round,
Cruiser II Top, 6'7" inside, full-time upper bed w/ kind'a EB50 layout, cozy 4-season rig
Solar: 540 W of Kyrocera w/ Blue Sky 3024iL, 3x100 AmpHr AGM's
Electrical: 4 cf fridge, nuker, water heater, compressor
Propane: stove top, furnace Travel: https://www.lugnutlife.wordpress.com
coyotearms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 01:38 PM   #96
Senior Member
 
rallypanam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Francisco/Nevada City
Posts: 3,769
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by coyotearms
Your signature indicates you have a 2007 with SMB interior. Doesn't you door Ford Tire Label state you should be using E rated tires? If so, you are taking the chance of being at fault in an accident no matter who you think was the problem. Are you sure you are not exceeding the load rating of the tires you use? Some folks still do not know the importance of the E rating for their SMB rigs, which has be covered many times on this forum in other threads. Over and out---this thread has gotten scary!
D's (aka 119) are (I think) good for about 3000 pounds, so that should be sufficient for a normal 4x4 SMB at around 10,000 pounds. I prefer Es (aka 126) which are more like 3800.
rallypanam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 01:42 PM   #97
Senior Member
 
E350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sacramento Delta, CA
Posts: 1,024
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

Coyotearms hit the nail on the head. Weigh your rig when loaded for your next adventure. Divide by four. Look at the max load rating on the sidewall of your tire. Is it a comfortably higher number than the weight per tire of your loaded rig?

Better yet, after weighing the total weight of your loaded rig, weigh the front and back of your rig separately. (This could be especially important if your rig has a heavy diesel engine in the front.) Divide each value by two. Look at the max load rating on the sidewall of your tire. Are the front tires and rear tires a comfortably higher number than the weight per tire of your loaded rig?

Could this be the reason that carringb runs a dually rear tire set up on his rig? Would be helpful to have his thoughts on this...

Could this be one reason that some of us are trying to shed weight rather than add weight by adding heavy bumpers, etc.?

Does tire pressure affect the actual load bearing capacity of a tire?

For instance this is what it says re my Michelins:

LTX® M/S2 LT265/70R17/E Max load rating is 3195 @ 80 PSI

But I don't drive them at 80 PSI. I drive them at less PSI.

So what is their effective load rating at less PSI than that spec'd?

For those running "D" rated tires, what is the max load rating at what PSI of your "D" rated tire?

Edit: rallypanam please post the make, model and size and actual max load rating at what PSI of your E rated tires. I am very interested if they are truly 3800 lbs. per tire.
__________________
2002 E350 ext.; 160K; 7.3L; 4R100 (w/4x4 deep pan & filter); 4x4 conv. w/2007 F250/F350 coil frnt axle (oppos. dual Bilstein press. shocks cured DW) diff chg from 3.55 to 3.73 (bad!); BW1356 t.c. (bad!); LT265/70R17/E Michelin LTX M/S2; Engel MT60 Combi Fridge-Freezer; 4 BP 380J pv panels; Auragen 5kw AC gen. in top alt. position; Webasto Dual-Top; Voyager top. 1995 5.8L EB Bronco, bone stock.
E350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 01:52 PM   #98
Site Team
 
BroncoHauler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern New Mexico
Posts: 10,179
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

I'd like to hear what Daveb thinks about this.
__________________
SMB-less as of 02/04/2012. Our savings account is richer, but our adventures are poorer.
BroncoHauler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 02:02 PM   #99
Senior Member
 
rallypanam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Francisco/Nevada City
Posts: 3,769
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by E350
Does tire pressure affect the actual load bearing capacity of a tire?
Definitely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by E350
please post the make, model and size and actual max load rating at what PSI of your E rated tires. I am very interested if they are truly 3800 lbs. per tire.
Well, whether they are truly at the stated rating or not I can't say, but the stated rating of my E rated BFG ATs is 126 I believe (the new KO2s are definitely 126). So as per this chart, that's more than 3640: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tire_code

[EDIT: 3750 @ 80PSI according to BFG, so I was wrong on the 3800, but not by much: http://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/tire-sel ... #techspecs]

Of course, it's the heaviest rated tire I can get, so whether it's 3200 or 3500 or 3800 is kind of immaterial.
rallypanam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2015, 02:06 PM   #100
Senior Member
 
rallypanam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Francisco/Nevada City
Posts: 3,769
Re: Yet another BFG Tire fail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by E350
Weigh your rig when loaded for your next adventure. Divide by four. Look at the max load rating on the sidewall of your tire. Is it a comfortably higher number than the weight per tire of your loaded rig?
P.S. My rig, 4x4 diesel, loaded with camping gear, full water, full 55 gallons of diesel, with dirtbike and carrier on the back, is about 10,500. So a 2600 pound rating would be theoretically sufficient (not that I would want to do that though).
rallypanam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Sportsmobile SIP or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.