Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-22-2016, 09:49 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 752
Hahaha LOL. I didn't say I'd buy the Action Camper in lieu of a SMS, only that I'd choose it over the XP! If I were to sacrifice that much space to begin with, I'd just go ahead and go with the AC so I could reach places in the Jeep that I couldn't reach in the pickup truck. And I'd only do it if I were by myself. With the wife aboard, ergonomics and enough living space become very important and other factors have to be sacrificed.

I like the AC more than the Ursa just because the top is hard. I don't want an RTT in wind and rain. The Ursa with the big tent is similar to the now defunct EarthRoamer XV-JP.

TomH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2016, 10:37 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
86Scotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 10,375
Anyone who is thinking of a more capable offroad camper than an SMB needs to watch some Ridge videos (Chris Ridgeway). He drives up cliffs in an older 5.8 4wd van with a military trailer that weighs as much as the van, no winch or anything. Vans are capable if you're willing to try.

86Scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2016, 03:34 PM   #13
Site Team
 
daveb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Turlock Ca
Posts: 10,412
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86Scotty View Post
Vans are capable if you're willing to try.

That might be true but a large vehicle can be difficult to extract in the case of a breakdown. That always haunts me. A Jeep or a Toyota would be easier to haul out. I've also ran into height/width issues on some trails with my van. So far I've felt my van is a good match of off road capability & comfortable livable space but its not the perfect solution. With all the variables it just matters where you want to go and the size of living quarters you're willing to put up with. IIRC the UJoint XP was on a E-350 cutaway. The foot print was as large as a SMB.
__________________
2006 Ford 6.0PSD EB-50/E-PH SMB 4X4 Rock Crawler Trailer

Sportsmobile 4X4 Adventures..........On and off road adventures
daveb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2016, 05:09 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
86Scotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 10,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveb View Post
That might be true but a large vehicle can be difficult to extract in the case of a breakdown. That always haunts me. A Jeep or a Toyota would be easier to haul out. I've also ran into height/width issues on some trails with my van. So far I've felt my van is a good match of off road capability & comfortable livable space but its not the perfect solution. With all the variables it just matters where you want to go and the size of living quarters you're willing to put up with. IIRC the UJoint XP was on a E-350 cutaway. The foot print was as large as a SMB.
Very true Dave, very true.

86Scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2016, 10:58 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 242
We seriously looked at an XP V1, but it had a lot of shortcomings that we couldn't get around. If you want a truck camper that is more robust than most, but doesn't have the height or weight of most truck campers, the XP could work for you.
Wrinkledpants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2017, 09:24 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
expeditionnw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: PDX
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveb View Post
That might be true but a large vehicle can be difficult to extract in the case of a breakdown. That always haunts me. A Jeep or a Toyota would be easier to haul out. I've also ran into height/width issues on some trails with my van. So far I've felt my van is a good match of off road capability & comfortable livable space but its not the perfect solution. With all the variables it just matters where you want to go and the size of living quarters you're willing to put up with. IIRC the UJoint XP was on a E-350 cutaway. The foot print was as large as a SMB.
I would Posit that a vehicle that is working within its weight class will be far more reliable than a smaller vehicle that is far exceeding its capacity.

When packed to support two people for a month long trip, The difference between my heavily modified land rover and my E350 4x4 diesel is about 2000lbs.

My rover had a max payload of about 1000 lbs, which we more than doubled. the truck weighed 4300lbs stock, weighed 6500lbs loaded.

My van has a payload of 4400lbs, which we are under by 1000lbs.
Fully loaded and 4x4, It weighs Just under 9000lbs.

We ran the piss out of the rover for many many miles, I know the van will do the same stuff, just more reliably.

Recovery difficulty depends a lot on the damage sustained. Its my opinion that a catastrophic drivetrain failure will happen much sooner on a smaller truck that is overloaded. Axleshaft breakage, wheel bearing failure, etc. moving a truck that doesnt roll really sucks. If youve opened up a ford sterling axle, youll agree breakage is an unlikely prospect.
expeditionnw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Sportsmobile Registry

DADDOZR

REDOVAL

Loud Mobile

pinz712
Add your Sportsmobile
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Sportsmobile SIP or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.