Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockman
Interesting.
I don't know what came stock on my 06, but will check the spare today. I have 285/70 17's on now and they rub the fender wall very bad. See my gallery, about 1/4" in mid turn, not full lock, which is fine.
Input and I have determined that this is due to the 4.25" backspacing and making the wheel travel further on a circle, rather than pivot.
|
4.25" BS doesn't mean much without knowing the wheel width. But since most 17" are about 8" that's what I'll go with. Aprox, 0 offset is about perfect for the wheel travel in a circle as you described. But that doesn't work all that well on Quigleys when you want larger tires. You need to tuck the larger tires inside the fenders so they don't hit the wheel arch. That's why a bigger BS is required. But as an example 4.25" BS on a 7" rim would work perfectly well, just not on anything wider.
It's the actual center point of the rim that matters, that's why offset is a better measurement to use over back spacing when fender clearance when turning is the issue, and backspacing is a better measurement to use when suspension clearance is an issue.
My 20" were 5.75 BS on 8.5" rim and 34" tires with 305 width worked well since they had a positive offset of about 25, or 1", only problem was limited steering.
I also have a 20" x 8.5 rim with 4.5" BS, 0 offset not even 33" on a 305 width fit with those.
My 17" are 8" wide and 0 offset, so 4.5" BS, they *just* fit with 285/75/17.
When going for new wheels, I decided to keep a slightly wider stance and limit my tire choice / width than go with wheels that tuck the tires in a bit, but allow me to run something bigger. I feel that gives the van a slightly better ride, and I can always trim the fenders if I want larger.